Knowledge Center

Thursday, March 22, 2018

Jordan Goodman Provides Insight to State Tax Notes on Potential Affect of the Supreme Court Decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc.

An article publised by State Tax Notes covers a panel discussion regarding whether or not the U.S. solicitor general is correct that Quill Corp. v. North Dakota should be applied only to traditional mail-order retailers.

University of Connecticut law professor Richard Pomp applauded the solicitor general's amicus brief in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc., in which the solicitor argued that the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota has no ongoing relevance.

"However, Jordan Goodman of Horwood Marcus & Berk cautioned that the Supreme Court could determine that making a decision in Wayfair would create chaos and remand the case, once again telling Congress to act."

The full article, "Quill Should Apply Only to Mail-Order Retailers, Panelists Agree," was written by Andrea Muse and published by State Tax Notes on March 22, 2018 for its subscribers. (Subscription required)

Contact Jordan Goodman with questions


NOTICE: Emailing an attorney shall not and does not create an attorney-client relationship between the attorney and users of this web site or any other party whatsoever. An attorney-client relationship is ONLY established through a written engagement, and only where doing so would comply with all applicable laws and ethical rules.

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: Transmission of information on-line, over email, or through any electronic means can be unstable, unreliable and insecure. You should not send information or facts via e-mail relating to your legal problem or question. If you do not have an existing attorney-client relationship, your e-mail may not be privileged or confidential.

By clicking 'OK' below, you are agreeing to the terms of this web site.

Please fill out the form below and we'll send an email out about this page to a recipient of your choice.

Copy: Check here if you would like a copy of the email.